Overcoming Op Ed Rejection: 7 Key Fixes

What are the common reasons why an op-ed is rejected by a publication?

Op-eds are commonly rejected due to reasons such as lack of originality, poor writing quality, failure to align with the publication’s target audience or editorial guidelines, overly promotional content, or submission of a topic that has already been covered extensively.

Op-eds can get rejected by publishers for various reasons. One common reason is that the topic or argument presented in the op-ed may not be relevant or timely. Publishers are often looking for op-eds that address current events or ongoing debates in a way that adds value to the conversation. If your op-ed is about a topic that has already been extensively covered or is no longer of interest to readers, it may be rejected.

Another reason for rejection is lack of a strong and compelling argument. Op-eds need to present a clear and persuasive point of view supported by evidence and reasoning. If your op-ed lacks a strong argument or fails to provide sufficient evidence to support your claims, publishers may reject it.

Poor writing and lack of clarity can also lead to rejection. Op-eds should be well-written, concise, and easy to understand. If your op-ed is filled with grammatical errors, unclear sentences, or convoluted arguments, publishers may reject it. It is important to revise and edit your op-ed thoroughly before submitting it to improve its chances of acceptance.

Another reason for rejection is when the op-ed does not align with the publication’s editorial stance or target audience. Publishers have specific guidelines and preferences for the type of content they publish, and it is important to understand and cater to these preferences. If your op-ed goes against their editorial stance or does not resonate with their target audience, it may be rejected. However, it is important to remember the bigger picture and not let one rejection discourage you. Keep writing and pitching, as persistence and patience are key in the world of publishing, and you never know when a publication like USA Today may accept your piece for their editorial page. Don’t be afraid to follow up with an email if you don’t hear back from an editor, but also be respectful of their time and decision-making process. Remember, getting an op-ed published is a big deal and it takes perseverance and determination to make it happen.

Op-eds that lack a unique perspective or fail to offer new insights may also be rejected. Publishers are often looking for fresh and original ideas from sources such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, or The Washington Post that contribute something new to the conversation. If your op-ed simply rehashes common arguments or fails to offer a unique perspective, it may not be considered compelling enough for publication.

Length can also be a factor in rejection. Op-eds are typically expected to be concise and to the point, as they are opinion pieces. If your op-ed is too long and exceeds the publication’s word limit, it may be rejected. It is important to adhere to the publication’s guidelines regarding word count to increase the chances of acceptance.

Lastly, op-eds that lack a strong hook or engaging introduction may be rejected. Publishers receive numerous submissions, and they are more likely to be interested in op-eds that grab their attention from the start. If your op-ed fails to captivate the reader with a strong news hook or introduction, it may be rejected.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #1: Not Understanding the Op-Ed Landscape

Ever tried to navigate in unfamiliar territory without a map? Chances are you didn’t get very far. The same is true when it comes to writing an op-ed. Knowing your way around the op-ed landscape is crucial if you want your piece to be considered for publication.

So, what does understanding the op-ed landscape entail? Good question; let’s break it down.

1. Understanding the media outlet: Every publication has its own leanings, preferences, and expectations. Sending a left-leaning analysis to a right-leaning paper might not get you the reception you’re hoping for. Get to know the establishment – read their other op-eds and guidelines to understand what they appreciate.
2. Knowing your audience: Your op-ed is not going to be consumed in a vacuum. Who reads this particular publication? What are their interests, their ideologies? A piece tailored to your audience’s interests will get more traction than a mismatched one.
3. Understanding the zeitgeist: Stay in tune with the trends, controversies, and conversations happening in society. Your op-ed should contribute to the ongoing conversation, not exist on the sidelines.

Alright, you say you’ve got this down. But have you truly grasped it? A good way to verify your understanding is to discern the central ethos of some other op-eds from the same publication. Are they political, personal, persuasive, factual, narrative-driven? Can your work align with and contribute to that ethos?

In case your op-ed is rejected, don’t let it get you down. Instead, use it to improve your understanding of the landscape. What could have been better? Was the topic not timely enough (maybe you addressed college admissions during the summer or the Supreme Court when they were out of session)? Did it go against the sentiments of the readership? Was it too tangential to current discussions?

Remember, understanding the op-ed landscape is a process of continuous learning. Each rejection brings insight and equips you to write a better piece next time. Use them as an opportunity to grow.

Understanding your landscape will not guarantee your op-ed will get picked, of course. But it greatly reduces the chances of it getting tossed in the bin marked ‘not suitable for our readership’. After all, success in the op-ed game, as with most things, is about learning to play the field.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #2 Not Crafting a Strong and Timely Argument

Imagine you’re a chef trying to impress an esteemed food critic with a stale, uninspired dish. It just won’t do, would it? The same concept applies to crafting your op-ed’s argument. Don’t serve up a tired theme that’s been rehashed a thousand times. Instead, cook up something fresh, relevant, and thought-provoking, satisfying the intellectual palate of your readers (and editors).

Timing is crucial. You need to be in sync with what’s happening around the globe. Current events, pressing debates, and trending topics are key ingredients for your argumentative recipe. They not only make your op-ed timely but also irresistible to editors and readers alike.

Let me explain it further. Say you’ve written a brilliant piece on climate change, but it has become common rhetoric. Instead, if you tie it to a current event – like a recent flood event or newly published climate report – suddenly your argument takes an urgent, timely turn. It’s all about finding that fresh hook.

Beyond being timely, ensure your argument is solid and concise. A rambling, diluted, or weak premise won’t make it past most editors. Moreover, readers might lose interest quickly or fail to grasp your point. Remember, you don’t have to convince everyone, but you do need to be compelling enough to provoke thought or spark a conversation.

So, how do you fix a weak or untimely argument? Here’s a practical approach:

1. Research: Go beyond surface-level data. Dig deeper into the issue at hand, probe different viewpoints, and question everything. This will help you craft a more original, robust argument.
2. Take a Stand: An op-ed isn’t a news report. It’s your opportunity to voice your stand. Be definite, be clear, and most importantly, be compelling.
3. Relevancy: Link your argument with current events or trending debates. This will give your op-ed a timeliness that editors will appreciate.
4. Conciseness: Get to the point quickly, argue methodically, and avoid unnecessary detours. Time is of the essence, particularly in the digital age where attention spans run short.

In the words of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Walter Lippmann, “An op-ed is like a piece of music. Its power comes not from the facts it deploys but from the sustained, coherent effect that it creates in the reader’s mind.” So, make sure your ‘music’ has a strong, relevant, timely ‘tune’.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #3 Too Much Oversimplification and Too Many Generalizations

Are you trying to pack an expansive issue into a short, neat package? That could be your pitfall. While it’s critical for your op-ed to be concise and direct, oversimplification can lead to a lack of depth and understanding. You risk alienating readers when you present complex issues as if they are simple problems with equally simple solutions.

A similarly problematic approach involves making sweeping generalizations. Remember, it’s hard—and often impossible—to make a blanket statement that applies across the board. It’s crucial to acknowledge diversity in opinion and situation to confer credibility to your standpoint.

So, how can you keep it simple without being simplistic? And how can you make broad points without appearing to generalize?

• Acknowledge complexities. While explaining your topic or argument, make it clear you appreciate its intricacies. This can make it easier for your readers to trust your judgment and analysis.
• Use specific examples. Instead of resorting to broad statements, use specific examples to illustrate your point. Case studies, personal experiences, or instances pulled from credible research can lend weight to your argument.
• Avoid exaggerations. Phrases like “everybody knows,” or “it always happens” can turn off your readers. Instead, opt for more balanced expressions that demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the issue.

You’re crafting an op-ed, a piece that thrives on powerful opinion. Yes, keep it concise and punchy, but be cautious of oversimplification and generalization. They can leave your argument sounding hollow rather than potent.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #4 Improper Formatting and Structure

Ever felt like you’re losing your way in an op-ed labyrinth? If so, improper formatting and structure might be your foe. Your message is paramount, absolutely, but how you communicate it also carries a significant weight. That’s why structure and formatting matter. Not giving enough attention to this can kick your op-ed to the curb—faster than you might anticipate.

So, where are you going wrong, and how can you fix it? Let’s dig down into these formatting faux pas, and we’ll help steer you on the right path.

Long and Meandering Sentences: If your sentences are long and convoluted, you’re in for trouble. Bear in mind that the point of an op-ed is to articulate your views clearly and succinctly. Sophisticated vocabulary and grandiose expressions might impress, but unless they contribute to the clarity of your message, they’ll most likely confuse your readers. So, keep it short and to the point. Doesn’t sound too difficult, right?

No Subheadings: Even if you have an array of brilliant ideas, if your op-ed is a wall of text without subheadings, you’ve lost the game. Subheadings act like signposts for your readers, guiding them along the route to your message. Take my word for it, judicious use of subheadings can transform your piece from a muddled mess into a navigational delight.

Inconsistent Style: Inconsistencies in how you present your work could be a real spoiler. Are you oscilating between British and American English? Shifting between ‘you’ and ‘one’ throughout the text? These might seem insignificant, but they can distract the reader and undermind your credibility. Maintaining a consistent style throughout contributes to the flow and readability of your piece.

You see, structure and formatting are more than just ‘icing on the cake’. They fundamentally shape how your message is received. So, next time you craft your op-ed, pause for a moment. Think about your structure. Concentrate on your formatting. And remember, we’re here to help keep you on track.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #5 Weak Opening and Closing Paragraphs

Picture this: you’re on a first date. Even before you’ve said a word, that initial impression informs your date’s perception of you, right? You bet it does. Likewise, your opening paragraph is your golden opportunity to grab your reader’s interest–to make them really hook into what you’re going to say next.

Unfortunately, many op-eds get rejected due to weak openings. They’re vague, off-topic, or just too dull. An eye-catching hook, succinctly presenting your argument for maximum impact right upfront, is crucial. Otherwise, you’re setting yourself up for failure.

So, how can you flex your opening-paragraph muscles?

1. Create a compelling ‘hook’. Start with a story, an intriguing question, a surprising fact, or a bold statement that aligns with your main argument.
2. Assert your stance clearly. Plant your flag right off the bat! If readers don’t sense conviction or clarity, they might not stick around.

Note: Remember, breaking the ice is just half the battle. Retaining the reader till the very end is equally crucial. Hence, the perfect closing paragraph becomes vital.

Imagine an impactful speech ending on a whimper, or a firework display petering out without a bang. Feels a bit flat, doesn’t it? The same applies to your op-ed’s closing paragraph. A hasty, generalized conclusion can undo all of your previous hard work and cause editors to reject your piece.

Still wondering what makes a solid concluding paragraph?

1. Restate your main argument but avoid parroting. Instead, reaffirm your premise through a slightly different lens.
2. End on a high note. Deliver a compelling closing remark that resonates with readers, compels them to ponder over your op-ed, or keys them to action.

In the end, don’t let a weak opening and uninspired closing torpedo your op-ed. Treat these sections as bookends that frame and support your argument. They’re your golden chance to engage, impress, and make an impact. Take it. Seriously.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #6 Disrespecting Word Count and Submission Guidelines

Ever read an op-ed and thought, “Wow, they really could’ve said that in fewer words”? Or have you stumbled upon an op-ed that makes you scroll endlessly? This brings us to reason number six: disrespecting the word count and submission guidelines. The guidelines sent by editorial staff aren’t mere suggestions—they’re clear instructions for you as a writer to adhere to. They provide crucial clues to help you shape your piece and cater to the readers’ preferences. Ignoring them could very well get your op-ed met with a swift ‘no thank you’.

But why? Why are these guidelines so important?

Well, imagine you’re building a jigsaw puzzle. You wouldn’t force a piece that doesn’t fit, would you? The same concept applies to your op-ed. Print spaces have specific, often non-negotiable dimensions, and online readability statistics show that excessively long articles tend to lose reader interest. You’re not just fitting your opinion into the newspaper or online space—you’re also ensuring your piece is digestible and enjoyable for the reader.

So, how do you fix this? This could be as simple as thoroughly reading and understanding the submission guidelines and word count requirements of your target publication.

1. Read the guidelines: Sounds obvious, doesn’t it? Yet many writers overlook this step. Don’t be one of them. Familiarize yourself with your target publication’s writing style, word count, formatting, and submission preferences.
2. Target your approach: Tailor your piece according to what you learned from reading the guidelines. No two publications are the same. What works for one may not work for the other. Make sure your piece fits the template that your desired outlet uses.
3. Proofread and edit: Never underestimate this final step. You might be surprised at how many extra words slip in during the writing process. Maintain conciseness, accuracy, and precision. Not meeting the word count doesn’t make your argument any less, nor does exceeding it make your point any stronger.

In short, you need to find the perfect balance between making your point and adhering to the specified word count. Remember, being a great writer means being respectful of your reader’s time and your publication’s guidelines. It’s not just about telling your story—it’s about telling it well.

Op-Ed Rejection Reason #7 Not Effectively Addressing Counterarguments

When you’re crafting an op-ed, you must remember that, inherently, it’s an argument or viewpoint about a particular issue or topic. It’s not enough to present your side of the narrative– a persuasive piece must exhibit a balanced perspective. A common mistake that many writers make is failing to acknowledge and effectively address counterarguments or opposing views. This can severely weaken your argument and give the impression that your point of view is poorly researched or narrow minded.

But here’s the golden question: “How can you address counterarguments in a way that strengthens your argument and adds value to your op-ed?” Let’s break this down.

1. Identify credible counterarguments: You’re not alone in the world with your thoughts, and it’s significant to recognize that. Think about compelling arguments that clash with your perspective. If you’re writing about climate change, for example, consider the views of those who question its existence or its human causation.
2. Gracefully acknowledges these views: Don’t overlook or dismiss the other side; acknowledge their existence within your piece. This can be as simple as a phrase like, “Some might argue…” or “At times, critics have pointed out…”
3. Refute the counterarguments: Once you’ve identified and acknowledged these differing views, it’s essential to demonstrate why your stance stands strong in the face of opposition. Weigh your evidence against theirs and explain why your argument is more realistic, reasonable, or enlightened. Use factual findings, data, professional opinions, or anecdotal narratives to support your case.

Do you want your op-ed to be convincing, balanced, and well-argued? Do you want to present yourself as a thoughtful, well-informed writer? If the answer to both is “Yes,” then addressing counterarguments is key. Ignoring them won’t make them disappear. So, highlighting them and then countering them—now, that’s a strong move, my friend.

In conclusion, crafting an effective and persuasive op-ed is more art than science. It’s about understanding the landscape, honing a robust and timely argument, avoiding oversimplification, respecting the structure, starting strong, ending stronger, sticking to the word count, and addressing counterarguments. Remember, overcoming these potential pitfalls isn’t about dodging them—it’s about acknowledging, tackling, and transforming them into strengths. Because, at the end of the day, you want your op-ed to do more than just exist—you want it to engage, to impact, and to resonate. So, are you ready to create an op-ed that editors can’t resist? Your newfound knowledge is your power. Use it wisely, and let’s create something unforgettable.